Yazar "Duman, Ibrahim" seçeneğine göre listele

Listeleniyor 1 - 2 / 2
  • Küçük Resim
    Öğe
    Comparative results of transurethral incision with transurethral resection of the prostate in renal transplant recipients with benign prostate hyperplasia
    (Urol & Nephrol Res Ctr-Unrc, 2018) Sarıer, Mehmet; Duman, Ibrahim; Kılıç, Süleyman Sırrı; Yüksel, Yücel; Demir, Meltem; Aslan, Mesut; Yucetin, L.; Tekin, S.; Yavuz, A.H.; Emek, M.
    Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the results of transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the surgical treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) in patients with renal transplantation. Materials and Methods: Between April 2009 and May 2016, BPH patients with renal transplants whose prostate volumes were less than 30 cm(3) were treated surgically. Forty-seven patients received TURP and 32 received TUIP. The patients' age, duration of dialysis, duration between transplant and TURP/TUIP, preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine (SCr), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Qmax) and postvoid residual volume (PVR) were recorded. At 1-,6- and 12-month follow-up, early and long-term complications were assessed. Results were evaluated retrospectively. Results: In both groups, SCr, PVR and IPSS decreased significantly after the operation, while Qmax increased significantly (P < .001). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of increase in Qmax and decrease in IPSS, SCr and PVR (P = .89, P = .27, P = .08, and P = .27). Among postoperative complications, urinary tract infection (UTIs) and retrograde ejaculation (RE) rates were higher in the TURP group than the TUIP group (12.7% versus 6.2% and 68.1% versus 25%,respectively), whereas urethral strictures were more prevalent in the TUIP group (12.5% versus 6.3%). Conclusion: For the treatment of BPH in renal transplant patients with a prostate volume less than 30 cm(3) , both TUIP and TURP are safe and effective.
  • Küçük Resim
    Öğe
    Evaluation of histopathologic results of testicular tumors in Antalya: multi center study
    (Galenos Yayincilik, 2020) Sarıer, Mehmet; Tunc, Mustafa; Ozel, Esin; Duman, Ibrahim; Kaya, Sagfettin; Hoscan, Mustafa Burak; Unsal, Cagatay
    Objective: Testicular tumors constitute 1% of all malignancies in men. Being a relatively uncommon tumor, there are few descriptive studies in the literature. The aim of this study is to retrospectively investigate the histopathological results of testicular tumors in our region. Materials and Methods: In this descriptive multicenter study, we evaluated the histopathologic results of 124 patients who underwent radical or partial orchiectomy with a diagnosis of testicular tumor between 2011 and 2019 in the region of Antalya, Turkey. All specimens were examined by the pathologists in a single center. Data pertaining to patient age, type of operation, histopathological tumor type, tumor size, and pathological stage of the primary tumor (pT) were analyzed. Results: The mean age of the 124 patients included in the study was 35.14 +/- 15.3 (2-80) years. Most (98.4%) of the analyzed specimens were radical orchiectomy materials, while only 1.6% were partial orchiectomy materials. Mean tumor size was 4.01 +/- 2.29 (0.5-11) cm. Tumor size was <= 2 cm in 29 (23.4%) specimens and >= 2 cm in 95 (76.6%) specimens. In terms of histopathology, 76.8% were germ cell tumors, 6.4% were gender cord-stromal tumors, 4.8% were ductal canal and rete testis tumors, and 12% were secondary tumors of the testis. Pathological stage of the pT was pT1 in 46%, pT2 in 39%, and pT3 in 15% of the patients. Conclusion: Although patient age and histopathological distribution of testicular tumors were generally consistent with the literature, the average tumor size in the orchiectomy materials was notably large. Initiatives are required to increase public awareness of the importance of early detection. In addition, our findings suggest that urologists feel hesitant to practice testis-sparing surgery despite recommendations in international guidelines.