Akbaş, AhmetAydın Kasap, ZelihaHacim, Nadir AdnanTokoçin, MerveAltınel, YükselYiğitbaş, HakanMeriç, SerhatOkumuş, Bakiye2020-09-242020-09-242020Akbaş, A., Aydın Kasap, Z., Hacım, N. A., Tokoçin, M., Altınel, Y., Yiğitbaş, H., . . . Okumuş, B. (2020). The value of inflammatory markers in diagnosing acute appendicitis in pregnant patients. [Gebe hastalarda enflamatuvar belirteçlerin akut apandisit tanısı koymadaki değeri] Ulusal Travma Ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, 26(5), 769-776. doi:10.14744/tjtes.2020.034561306696Xhttps://doi.org/10.14744/tjtes.2020.03456https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12713/1083BACKGROUND: Acute appendicitis (AA) is the most common extra-obstetric condition requiring surgery during pregnancy. AA diagnosis is made by laboratory tests along with anamnesis and physical examination findings. Due to the physiological and anatomical changes during the pregnancy, AA diagnosis is more challenging in pregnant women compared to non-pregnant patients. The present study evaluated the significance of white blood cell counts (WBC), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) and lymphocyte-to-C-reactive protein ratio (LCR) to diagnose acute appendicitis during pregnancy. METHODS: Pregnant patients admitted to General Surgery Inpatient Clinic with AA pre-diagnosis in September 2015-December 2019 period were screened using International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems-10 (ICD-10) diagnosis code (K35= acute appendicitis, Z33= pregnancy), and AA patients were identified retrospectively. The patients were divided into two groups. The Group I included the patients who had appendectomy due to AA and had a suppurative appendicitis diagnosis based on the pathological evaluation. On the other hand, Group II had the patients admitted as an inpatient with AA pre-diagnosis, but discharged from the hospital with full recovery without operation. Group III, i.e., the control group, on the other hand, was constituted by 32 randomly and prospectively recruited healthy pregnant women who were willing to participate in the study and who had matching study criteria among the patients followed in Obstetrics and Gynecology outpatient clinic of our hospital. RESULTS: This study included 96 pregnant women with an average age of 29.20±4.47 years (32 healthy pregnant women, 32 pregnant women followed for acute abdominal observation and 32 pregnant women who underwent appendectomy). Of these patients, three cases who turned out not to have suppurative appendicitis (negative appendectomy) and two cases found to have perforated appendicitis based on intraoperative and histopathological evaluations were excluded from this study. The results showed that Group I patients had significantly higher WBC (p=0.001), CAR (p=0.001) and NLR (p=0.001), but significantly lower LCR values (p=0.001) compared to the Groups II and III. Besides, based on logistic regression analysis, it was revealed that higher WBC, CAR and NLR values and lower LCR values were independent variables that could be used for the diagnosis of AA in pregnant women. CONCLUSION: Considering WBC, NLR, CAR and LCR parameters in addition to medical history, physical examination and imaging techniques could help clinicians diagnose acute appendicitis in pregnant women. © 2020 Turkish Association of Trauma and Emergency Surgery.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAcute AppendicitisCRP Albumin RatioLymphocyteNeutrophilPregnancyArticle26576977632946079WOS:0005805944000192-s2.0-85091037950Q410.14744/tjtes.2020.03456N/A372946