Alpay, NadirÖzcelik, UmitEren, EryiğitUslu, Bora2020-08-302020-08-302019Alpay, N., Ozcelik, U., Eren, E., & Uslu, B. (2019). Renal Transplantation in High Immunological Risk Patients: A Single-Center Experience. TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 51(7), 2298–2301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.04.0750041-13451873-2623https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2019.04.075https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12713/5641st International Transplant Network Congress -- OCT 17-21, 2018 -- Antalya, TURKEYBackground. Renal transplantation (RT) in high-risk patients is increasingly performed due to an inadequate organ pool and increased rate of RT after a failed transplantation. Safety and prognosis of RT in such patients with high risk is an ongoing debate. Herein we aimed to present our single-center experience on RT of high-risk patients. Methods. A total of 89 consecutive RT patients were included into this study in a 10-month period. Patients were divided into 3 groups: the low-risk group (n = 47) with negative panel reactive antibody (PRA), medium-risk group (n = 18) with positive PRA but mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) <2000, and high-risk group (n = 24) with positive PRA and MFI >2000 or donor specific antibody (DSA) positivity. Groups were compared in terms of demographic features, serum creatinine levels, acute rejection rates, delayed graft function (DGF), and patient or graft loss. Results. Age of the recipients were similar between the groups. Desensitization (7% vs 11% vs 42%, respectively, in low-, medium-, and high-risk groups; P = .001), plasmapheresis (6% vs 11% vs 46%, respectively, P < .001), and rituximab treatments (0% vs 0% vs 25%, respectively, P < .001) were significantly more frequently performed in high-risk patients. Serum creatinine levels at 1 month and 6 months after RT were similar between the groups (P = .43 and P = .71, respectively). Rates of acute rejection (6% vs 6% vs 16%, respectively, P = .52) and DGF (9% vs 11% vs 29%, respectively, P = .15) were similar between the groups. Frequencies of loss of patient or graft were also similar (0% vs 6% vs 4%, P = .15). Conclusion. RT may be successfully performed in high-risk patients without an increase in the risk of acute rejection, DGF, or patient/graft loss.eninfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessConference Object5172298230131405734WOS:0004873499000382-s2.0-85070197610Q410.1016/j.transproceed.2019.04.075Q3