• Türkçe
    • English
  • English 
    • Türkçe
    • English
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace@İSÜ
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed | DergiPark
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
  •   DSpace@İSÜ
  • Araştırma Çıktıları | TR-Dizin | WoS | Scopus | PubMed | DergiPark
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

The effect of magnetic field therapy and electric stimulation on experimental burn healing

Thumbnail

View/Open

Tam Metin / Full Text (270.0Kb)

Date

2019

Author

Keskin, Yasar
Tastekin, Nurettin
Kanter, Mehmet
Top, Husamettin
Ozdemir, Ferda
Erboga, Mustafa
Taspinar, Ozgur
Sut, Necdet

Metadata

Show full item record

Citation

Keskin, Y., Taştekin, N., Kanter, M., Top, H., Özdemir, F., Erboğa, M., ... & Süt, N. (2019). The effect of magnetic field therapy and electric stimulation on experimental burn healing. Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 65(4), 352.

Abstract

Objectives: : In this study, we aimed to compare morphological and histological differences between magnetic field and electric stimulation therapies in an experimental burn injury model in rats. Materials and methods: Between February 2011 and July 2011, a total of 21 Sprague-Dawley female rats were used in this study. Second-degree burns were induced on the back areas of the rats. All rats were equally divided into three groups including seven in each: the first burn group was treated with antibacterial pomade (Group 1, control group); the second group was treated with both antibacterial pomade and pulsed electromagnetic field therapy (Group 2); and the third group was treated with antibacterial pomade and electric stimulation for 14 days (Group 3). Results: Earlier re-epithelialization, wound area contraction, reduction of edema, and hyperaemia were observed on gross examination in the pulsed electromagnetic fields and electric stimulation therapy groups compared to the control group. Neovascularization, collagen density, granulation tissue formation, cell proliferation, and inflammatory cell response of the pulsed electromagnetic fields and electric stimulation group increased, compared to the control group, in the histopathological evaluation (p<0.05). Conclusion: Our study results showed the positive healing effects of electric stimulation and pulsed electromagnetic fields on burn injury. Pulsed electromagnetic fields therapy produced more positive signs of healing than the electric stimulation group.

Source

Turkish Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volume

65

Issue

4

URI

https://doi.org/10.5606/tftrd.2019.2899
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12713/675

Collections

  • Makale Koleksiyonu [149]
  • PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [922]
  • Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [1424]
  • TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [464]
  • WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu [1485]



DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 




| Instruction | Guide | Contact |

DSpace@İSÜ

by OpenAIRE
Advanced Search

sherpa/romeo

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution AuthorThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeLanguageDepartmentCategoryPublisherAccess TypeInstitution Author

My Account

LoginRegister

Statistics

View Google Analytics Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
@mire NV
 

 


|| Guide|| Instruction || Library || İstinye University || OAI-PMH ||

İstinye University, İstanbul, Turkey
If you find any errors in content, please contact:

Creative Commons License
İstinye University Institutional Repository is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 Unported License..

DSpace@İSÜ:


DSpace 6.2

tarafından İdeal DSpace hizmetleri çerçevesinde özelleştirilerek kurulmuştur.