Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYalcin, Yakup
dc.contributor.authorYalcin, Serenat Eris
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-30T20:07:02Z
dc.date.available2020-08-30T20:07:02Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationYalcin, Y., & Yalcin, S. E. (2019). Perioperative outcomes of bipolar energy instruments in total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Ginekologia Polska, 90(11), 640-644.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0017-0011
dc.identifier.issn2543-6767
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5603/GP.2019.0112
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12713/678
dc.descriptionWOS: 000500968100005en_US
dc.descriptionPubMed: 31802464en_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To compare conventional and advanced bipolar energy instruments in terms of perioperative outcomes in patients who underwent total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH). Material and methods: The data of 101 patients who underwent TLH between June 2017 and December 2018 for benign gynecological disorders were analyzed retrospectively. Conventional bipolar forceps (Robi forceps) were used in 37 patients and advanced bipolar instruments (LigaSure) were used in 64 patients. Data about the characteristics of the patients, operation time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay and other perioperative outcomes were compared. Results: The mean ages of the patients in the conventional bipolar and LigaSure groups were 47.6 +/- 6.5 and 48.1 +/- 7 years, respectively (p > 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups with regard to all other patient characteristics; body mass index, parity, previous pelvic operation and indications of hysterectomy (p > 0.05). The mean operation time (41 +/- 13.2 vs 37 +/- 11.5 min), estimated intraoperative blood loss (70 +/- 22 vs 65 +/- 21 mL) and absolute change in hemoglobin (-1.23 +/- 1.12 vs -1.11 +/- 1.14 g/dL) were slightly higher in the conventional bipolar group. However, there was no statistical significance with respect to these differences between the groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Our findings indicate that a conventional bipolar system is as safe and effective as LigaSure, and it may be used as an alternative option for patients undergoing TLH in low-income hospitals.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherVia Medicaen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.5603/GP.2019.0112en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectConventional Bipolar Instrumenten_US
dc.subjectLigasureen_US
dc.subjectVessel Sealingen_US
dc.subjectTotal Laparoscopic Hysterectomyen_US
dc.titlePerioperative outcomes of bipolar energy instruments in total laparoscopic hysterectomyen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentİstinye Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorYalcin, Yakupen_US
dc.identifier.volume90en_US
dc.identifier.issue11en_US
dc.identifier.startpage640en_US
dc.identifier.endpage644en_US
dc.relation.journalGinekologia Polskaen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record