Comparative results of transurethral incision with transurethral resection of the prostate in renal transplant recipients with benign prostate hyperplasia

View/ Open
Date
2018Author
Sarier, MehmetDuman, Ibrahim
Kilic, Suleyman
Yuksel, Yucel
Demir, Meltem
Aslan, Mesut
Yucetin, L.
Tekin, S.
Yavuz, A.H.
Emek, M.
Metadata
Show full item recordCitation
Sarier, M., Duman, I., Kilic, S., Yuksel, Y., Demir, M., Aslan, M., ... & Emek, M. (2018). Comparative results of transurethral incision with transurethral resection of the prostate in renal transplant recipients with benign prostate hyperplasia. Urology journal, 15(4), 209-213.Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the results of transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the surgical treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) in patients with renal transplantation. Materials and Methods: Between April 2009 and May 2016, BPH patients with renal transplants whose prostate volumes were less than 30 cm(3) were treated surgically. Forty-seven patients received TURP and 32 received TUIP. The patients' age, duration of dialysis, duration between transplant and TURP/TUIP, preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine (SCr), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Qmax) and postvoid residual volume (PVR) were recorded. At 1-,6- and 12-month follow-up, early and long-term complications were assessed. Results were evaluated retrospectively. Results: In both groups, SCr, PVR and IPSS decreased significantly after the operation, while Qmax increased significantly (P < .001). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of increase in Qmax and decrease in IPSS, SCr and PVR (P = .89, P = .27, P = .08, and P = .27). Among postoperative complications, urinary tract infection (UTIs) and retrograde ejaculation (RE) rates were higher in the TURP group than the TUIP group (12.7% versus 6.2% and 68.1% versus 25%,respectively), whereas urethral strictures were more prevalent in the TUIP group (12.5% versus 6.3%). Conclusion: For the treatment of BPH in renal transplant patients with a prostate volume less than 30 cm(3) , both TUIP and TURP are safe and effective.
Source
Urology JournalVolume
15Issue
4Collections
Related items
Showing items related by title, author, creator and subject.
-
The effect of ıntravesical prostatic protrusion in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia: controlled, clinical study
Kadihasanoglu, Mustafa; Aydin, Mustafa; Taskiran, Mehmet; Kendirci, Muammer (Karger, 2019)Background: Although prostate cancer releases more prostate-specific antigen (PSA) per unit of prostate volume (PV), data are limited regarding the association between intravesical prostatic protrusion (IPP) and the PSA ... -
Comparative results of transurethral incision with transurethral resection of the prostate in renal transplant recipients with benign prostate hyperplasia
Sarier M.; Duman I.; Kilic, Suleyman Sirri; Yuksel Y.; Demir M.; Aslan M.; Yucetin, L; Tekin, S.; Yavuz, A.H.; Emek M. (Urology and Nephrology Research Centre, 2018)Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare the results of transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the surgical treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) ... -
Low free and bioavailable testosterone levels may predict pathologically-proven high-risk prostate cancer: a prospective, clinical trial
Bayar, Goksel; Sirin, Hakan; Aydin, Mustafa; Ozagari, Aysim; Tanriverdi, Orhan; Kadihasanoglu, Mustafa; Kendirci, Muammer (Aves, 2017)Objective: To determine the predictive value of free and bioavailable testosterone levels on the detection of high-grade prostate cancer proven by histopathological examination of transrectal prostate biopsy specimens. ...