Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSarier, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorDuman, Ibrahim
dc.contributor.authorKilic, Suleyman
dc.contributor.authorYuksel, Yucel
dc.contributor.authorDemir, Meltem
dc.contributor.authorAslan, Mesut
dc.contributor.authorYucetin, L.
dc.contributor.authorTekin, S.
dc.contributor.authorYavuz, A.H.
dc.contributor.authorEmek, M.
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-30T20:07:29Z
dc.date.available2020-08-30T20:07:29Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationSarier, M., Duman, I., Kilic, S., Yuksel, Y., Demir, M., Aslan, M., ... & Emek, M. (2018). Comparative results of transurethral incision with transurethral resection of the prostate in renal transplant recipients with benign prostate hyperplasia. Urology journal, 15(4), 209-213.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1735-1308
dc.identifier.issn1735-546X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12713/775
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v0i0.4074en_US
dc.descriptionScopus'ta yayının sayfa aralığı 70-74 olarak görünmektedir. WOS ile aynı yayın olduğu tespit edildi ve düzeltildi.
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study is to compare the results of transurethral incision of the prostate (TUIP) and transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for the surgical treatment of benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) in patients with renal transplantation. Materials and Methods: Between April 2009 and May 2016, BPH patients with renal transplants whose prostate volumes were less than 30 cm(3) were treated surgically. Forty-seven patients received TURP and 32 received TUIP. The patients' age, duration of dialysis, duration between transplant and TURP/TUIP, preoperative and postoperative serum creatinine (SCr), International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Qmax) and postvoid residual volume (PVR) were recorded. At 1-,6- and 12-month follow-up, early and long-term complications were assessed. Results were evaluated retrospectively. Results: In both groups, SCr, PVR and IPSS decreased significantly after the operation, while Qmax increased significantly (P < .001). There was no difference between the two groups in terms of increase in Qmax and decrease in IPSS, SCr and PVR (P = .89, P = .27, P = .08, and P = .27). Among postoperative complications, urinary tract infection (UTIs) and retrograde ejaculation (RE) rates were higher in the TURP group than the TUIP group (12.7% versus 6.2% and 68.1% versus 25%,respectively), whereas urethral strictures were more prevalent in the TUIP group (12.5% versus 6.3%). Conclusion: For the treatment of BPH in renal transplant patients with a prostate volume less than 30 cm(3) , both TUIP and TURP are safe and effective.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherUrol & Nephrol Res Ctr-Unrcen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.22037/uj.v0i0.4074en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectBenign Prostate Hyperplasiaen_US
dc.subjectRenal Transplantationen_US
dc.subjectTransurethral Resection Of Prostateen_US
dc.subjectTransurethral Incision Of Prostateen_US
dc.subjectTuipen_US
dc.subjectTurpen_US
dc.titleComparative results of transurethral incision with transurethral resection of the prostate in renal transplant recipients with benign prostate hyperplasiaen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentİstinye Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.contributor.authorID0000-0003-0113-1371
dc.contributor.institutionauthorKilic, Suleyman Sirrien_US
dc.identifier.volume15en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.startpage209en_US
dc.identifier.endpage213en_US
dc.relation.journalUrology Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.description.wospublicationidWOS:000441478500011en_US
dc.description.pubmedpublicationid29464680en_US
dc.description.wosqualityQ3en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record