Comparison of the outcomes of spinal and general anesthesia for cesarean section in pregnant women with COVID-19

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorAydin, N.
dc.contributor.authorEsen, O.
dc.contributor.authorTüten, N.
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-19T14:33:36Z
dc.date.available2024-05-19T14:33:36Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİstinye Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractWe aimed to examine the efficacy and safety of spinal or general anesthesia for cesarean section (C/S) delivery in parturient with coronavirus illness (COVID-19). We carried out a retrospective cohort in our tertiary care centre's anesthesiology and reanimation department. We gathered the data from the medical files of 108 pregnant women (average age: 33.44±12.65 years) with COVID-19 who underwent cesarean section (C/S) with either general (Group I, n=30) or spinal anesthesia (Group II, n=78). We compared preoperative, intraoperative, postoperative respiratory, cardiac, hematological, and biochemical indicators between spinal and general anesthesia groups. Patients in Group I were significantly older (p<0.001), had longer APTT (p=0.015), PT (p=0.005), INR (p=0.003), higher levels of AST (p=0.012), CK (p=0.001), CRP (p<0.001), as well as longer duration of ICU stay (p<0.001), and hospitalization (p<0.001). Group II had higher preoperative levels of troponin T (p=0.001). In Group I, the levels of procalcitonin (p=0.002), lactate (p<0.001), AST (p<0.010), ALT (p=0.001), CRP (p<0.001), and total bilirubin (p<0.001) were significantly higher than Group II. Group II displayed increased levels of white blood cell count (p=0.023), CK (p=0.047), and LDH (p=0.001). Our data demonstrated that the selection of the mode of anesthesia must provide safe, patient-centered care and safeguard every member of the obstetric team from COVID-19 infection. During planning for cesarean section (C/S), certain care and special precautions should be employed, and the type of anesthesia must be selected on an individualized basis. © 2024 Ondokuz Mayis Universitesi. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.52142/omujecm.41.1.4
dc.identifier.endpage27en_US
dc.identifier.issn1309-4483
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85189533832en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage20en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.52142/omujecm.41.1.4
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12713/4283
dc.identifier.volume41en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherOndokuz Mayis Universitesien_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine (Turkey)en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.snmz20240519_kaen_US
dc.subjectCesarean Sectionen_US
dc.subjectCovıd-19en_US
dc.subjectGeneral Anesthesiaen_US
dc.subjectPregnancyen_US
dc.subjectSpinal Anesthesiaen_US
dc.titleComparison of the outcomes of spinal and general anesthesia for cesarean section in pregnant women with COVID-19en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu