The effect of different reciprocating angles on debris extrusion produced by R-Motion files - An in vitro study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.contributor.authorAl-Omari, T.M.N.
dc.contributor.authorArican, B.
dc.contributor.authorAtes, A.A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-19T14:33:48Z
dc.date.available2024-05-19T14:33:48Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİstinye Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Extrusion of debris resulting from canal preparation is an important topic of interest for dentists. This study assessed the performance of the R-Motion (RM) and Reciproc Blue (RB) systems on extracted teeth, for both apically extruded debris and time of preparation. Materials and Methods: Sixty mandibular premolar teeth with straight match canal anatomy were indiscriminately allocated to one of the three groups: RM-WO (WaveOne ALL-mode), RM-R (Reciproc ALL-mode), and RB with glide path (R ALL-mode). The amount of extruded debris apically was collected in preweighed plastic laboratory tubes during treatment, and the procedure time was recorded. The mean values of extruded debris were calculated by subtracting the postinstrumentation weight of tubes from the preinstrumentation weight. The data were statistically analyzed using the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey pairwise comparison tests. Results: Extrusion of debris was observed with all the samples. The RM group had less apical extrusion of debris compared to the RB group. Extruded debris in the RM-R group was numerically less than in the RM-WO group (P > 0.05) and significantly less than in the RB group (P < 0.05) (one-way ANOVA test; P < 0.05). In both motions, the preparation time required by RB was equal to that required by the RM file (One-way ANOVA test; P > 0.05). Conclusions: All samples showed extrusion of debris to some extent, irrespective of the motion used. RM-R was associated with the least amount of extruded debris. © 2024 Saudi Endodontic Journal | Published by Wolters Kluwer - Medknow.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4103/sej.sej_79_23
dc.identifier.endpage43en_US
dc.identifier.issn2278-9618
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85185317361en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage38en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.4103/sej.sej_79_23
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12713/4339
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Medknow Publicationsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofSaudi Endodontic Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.snmz20240519_kaen_US
dc.subjectDebris Extrusionen_US
dc.subjectExtrusionen_US
dc.subjectR-Motionen_US
dc.subjectReciproc Blueen_US
dc.subjectReciprocatingen_US
dc.titleThe effect of different reciprocating angles on debris extrusion produced by R-Motion files - An in vitro studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu