What is the most effective technique and composite for bonding aligner attachments to primary enamel?

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorwosidSubutay Han Altıntaş / KJD-5694-2024
dc.contributor.authorÇokakoğlu, Serpil
dc.contributor.authorNalçacı, Ruhi
dc.contributor.authorTozlu, Murat
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-18T07:40:22Z
dc.date.available2025-04-18T07:40:22Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİstinye Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This in vitro study evaluated the shear bond strength (SBS) of aligner attachments bonded to primary teeth with different techniques and composites. Material and Methods: Eighty attachments were prepared using five composites: An aligner composite (GC aligner connect [GAC'), two flowable restorative composites (G-aenial universal injectable and Estelite universal super low flow), and two one-step orthodontic composites integrated with primer (GC ortho connect flow and GC ortho connect). Aligner and restorative composites were applied with self- or total-etch (SE or TE) modes of universal adhesive (G-Premio Bond). Self-adhering composites integrated with primer were applied after acid etching. Excessive composites were removed with tungsten carbide burs after the polymerization of resin attachments. All primary teeth were exposed to thermocycling. Bond strength was determined with a universal testing machine. Remnant resin attachment was scored with the resin attachment remnant index. Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney, and Chi-square tests were used for statistical analyses. Results: The self-etching technique demonstrated lower SBS values compared to total-etching and self-adhering groups regardless of composite type. The highest SBS was found with aligner composite (GAC) and the totaletching technique. Self-adhering composites showed sufficiently high SBS values comparable with GAC and TE bonding techniques. The amount of remnant attachment was significantly higher in the total-etching and selfadhering groups compared to SE bonding with GAC (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Self-adhering orthodontic composites can be preferred to simplify the bonding of aligner attachments to primary enamel after acid etching.
dc.identifier.citationÇokakoğlu, S., Nalçacı, R., Tozlu, M., & Altıntaş, S. H. (2024). What is the most effective technique and composite for bonding aligner attachments to primary enamel?. Apos Trends In Orthodontics.
dc.identifier.doi10.25259/APOS_57_2023
dc.identifier.endpage41
dc.identifier.issn2321-4600
dc.identifier.issn2321-1407
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage35
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.25259/APOS_57_2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12713/6474
dc.identifier.volume14
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001199890800008
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/A
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.institutionauthorAltıntaş, Subutay Han
dc.institutionauthoridSubutay Han Altıntaş / 0000-0002-4563-7035
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherScientific Scholar
dc.relation.ispartofApos Trend in Orthodontics
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAligner
dc.subjectAttachment
dc.subjectBonding
dc.subjectPrimary Teeth
dc.titleWhat is the most effective technique and composite for bonding aligner attachments to primary enamel?
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.17 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu