The Reliability and Validity of the Timed Up & Go Test and the 30-S Sit-To-Stand Test Performed via Tele-Assessment in Ambulatory Patients with Stroke

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridKardeş, Kübra/0000-0003-4166-085X
dc.authorwosidKardeş, Kübra/X-9141-2018
dc.contributor.authorTutuneken, Yunus Emre
dc.contributor.authorCirak, Yasemin Buran
dc.contributor.authorKardes, Kubra
dc.contributor.authorIsikci, Burcu
dc.contributor.authorBinbuga, Ramazan
dc.contributor.authorCetrefli, Emre
dc.contributor.authorSarili, Mehmet
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-19T14:46:56Z
dc.date.available2024-05-19T14:46:56Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİstinye Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractThe aim of the study was to investigate the reliability and validity of the timed up & go (TUG) test and the 30-s sit-to-stand (30-s STS) test performed via tele-assessment in ambulatory patients with stroke. Sixty-one patients with chronic stroke were included. For reliability, test-retest and inter-rater reliability were determined. For validity, the correlation coefficient of the values obtained from the face-to-face and tele-assessment procedures of the TUG and 30s-STS tests carried out by the first rater was used. On the first day, the first rater made TUG and 30s-STS tests face-to-face. On the second day, the TUG and 30-s STS were repeated by the first and second raters using the tele-assessment procedure. The tests were applied as tele-assessment 5-7 days later by the first rater to determine the test-retest reliability of the tele-assessment method. ICC for the TUG and 30-s STS tests were 0.998 and 0.992, respectively. The inter-rater agreement between tele-assessments was good for both the TUG test (k = 0.996) and the 30-s STS test (k = 0.981). There was a very strong correlation between tele-assessment and face-to-face assessment of the TUG (r = 0.97) and the 30-s STS test (r = 0.94). The TUG and the 30-s STS tests performed via tele-assessment were reliable and valid for assessing functionality and lower extremity capacity of ambulatory patients with stroke.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipTUBITAK [1919B012107744]en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors thank the TUBITAK. This study was produced from project number 1919B012107744 supported by TUBITAK.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/1091367X.2024.2305797
dc.identifier.issn1091-367X
dc.identifier.issn1532-7841
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85184160079en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org10.1080/1091367X.2024.2305797
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12713/5623
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001152143400001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherRoutledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofMeasurement In Physical Education and Exercise Scienceen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.snmz20240519_kaen_US
dc.subjectTele-Assessmenten_US
dc.subjectStrokeen_US
dc.subjectTimed-Up And Go Testen_US
dc.subject30-S Sit-To-Stand Testen_US
dc.subjectReliabilityen_US
dc.titleThe Reliability and Validity of the Timed Up & Go Test and the 30-S Sit-To-Stand Test Performed via Tele-Assessment in Ambulatory Patients with Strokeen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu