Spinal augmentation: how to choose the best candidate?
dc.authorid | Çağatay Öztürk / 0000-0003-3133-206X | en_US |
dc.authorscopusid | Çağatay Öztürk / 8230555600 | |
dc.authorwosid | Çağatay Öztürk / FSD-8657-2022 | |
dc.contributor.author | Öztürk, Çağatay | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-30T20:07:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-30T20:07:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.department | İstinye Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü | en_US |
dc.description | WCO-IOF-ESCEO World Congress on Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis and Musculoskeletal Diseases -- APR 19-22, 2018 -- Krakow, POLAND | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | The overall management principles for treating spinal injuries focuses on maximizing clinical outcome by obtaining and maintaining spinal stability and optimizing neurologic function. An optimal treatment method should reduce the detrimental effects of injury, reduce pain and suffering, improve functional outcome and quality of life, provide the best outcome with the least amount of associated morbidity. In osteporotic patients without neurological deficit; we can do indirect reduction and kyphoplasty, indirect reduction and titanium vertebral body stent or percutaneous cement augmented pedicle screw fixation and kyphoplasty or titanium vertebral body stent. In the presence of neurological deficit; anterior decompression with mini open or endoscopic route is necessary. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | WCO, Int Osteoporosis Fdn, European Soc Clin & Econ Aspects Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis & Musculoskeletal Dis, Sinklar Conf Management B V, Mylan, Lilly, UCB, Medimaps, OsteoSys, Echolight, Abiogen Pharma, Bioventus, Pierre Fabre, Amgen, IBSA, Medi, Kyowa Kirin, Wisepress Com, EffRx, Alexion, Hologic, GE, Galgo Med, Bindex, AgNovos, Theramex, Fidia Pharma Grp, Biomedica, Radius, Roche, Sequola | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Ozturk, C. (2018). SPINAL AUGMENTATION: HOW TO CHOOSE THE BEST CANDIDATE? OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 29(1), S128. | en_US |
dc.identifier.endpage | S128 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0937-941X | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 1433-2965 | en_US |
dc.identifier.startpage | S128 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12713/798 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 29 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000440102400148 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q2 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.institutionauthor | Öztürk, Çağatay | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Springer London Ltd | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Osteoporosis International | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Konferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess | en_US |
dc.title | Spinal augmentation: how to choose the best candidate? | en_US |
dc.type | Conference Object | en_US |
Dosyalar
Orijinal paket
1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
- İsim:
- 266.pdf
- Boyut:
- 47.55 KB
- Biçim:
- Adobe Portable Document Format
- Açıklama:
- Tam Metin / Full Text