A single center study of the efficacy and safety of Pro-Glide used for closure in thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with previous groin intervention

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusidAhmet Anıl Şahin / 57200620149
dc.authorwosidAhmet Anıl Şahin / AFS-8068-2022
dc.contributor.authorGülmez, Recep
dc.contributor.authorAltunova, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorŞahin, Ahmet Anıl
dc.contributor.authorÇelik, Ömer
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-18T08:44:57Z
dc.date.available2025-04-18T08:44:57Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentİstinye Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, İSÜ Hastaneleri
dc.description.abstractBackground: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Pro-Glide, a suture-mediated vascular closure device, regarding technical success and complications in patients who had undergone aortic intervention and had previous groin intervention (PGI). Methods: One hundred and thirty-five patients who underwent percutaneous thoracic endovascular aortic repair via the femoral artery and were closed with the Pro-Glide device were analyzed retrospectively. PGI was defined as a history of open surgical access to the femoral artery or wide sheath (>18 F) placement due to endovascular or valvular intervention. The patients were divided into two groups 38 cases with PGI and 97 cases without PGI. Results: The overall success rate of closure of the femoral artery with Pro-Glide was not statistically significant between the two groups (93.8% vs 92.1%, p =.711). Sheath sizes were compared between the groups and PGI (+) group had significantly higher sheath sizes compared to PGI (−) group (24.3 ± 1.1 F vs 23.8 ± 1.0 F, p =.011). Three patients in the PGI (+) group and six patients in the PGI (−) group experienced technical failure of the percutaneous femoral approach. Femoral complications were seen after the procedures in four patients in the PGI (+) group and four in the PGI (−) group. The PGI (+) group had a higher complication rate when compared to the PGI (−) group; however, this was not statistically significant (p =.181). Conclusion: The present study was conducted on a significantly larger sample compared to previous studies and the findings suggest that the Pro-Glide vascular closure device is a safe option for patients with a history of PGI and may not be considered as a contraindication. © The Author(s) 2024.
dc.identifier.citationGulmez, R., Altunova, M., Sahin, A. A., & Celik, O. (2024). A single center study of the efficacy and safety of Pro-Glide used for closure in thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with previous groin intervention. Vascular, 17085381241236560.
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/17085381241236560
dc.identifier.endpage115
dc.identifier.issn17085381
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.pmid38403595
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85186607093
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage108
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17085381241236560
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12713/6601
dc.identifier.volume33
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001176350000001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.institutionauthorŞahin, Ahmet Anıl
dc.institutionauthoridAhmet Anıl Şahin / 0000-0003-1956-2348
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofVascular
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.subjectFemoral Scar
dc.subjectPerclose
dc.subjectPro-Glide
dc.subjectThoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair
dc.subjectVascular Closure Devices
dc.titleA single center study of the efficacy and safety of Pro-Glide used for closure in thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with previous groin intervention
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.17 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

İSÜ Hastaneleri Makale Koleksiyonu