Three dimensional patient-specific guides for guide pin positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: An experimental study on different glenoid types

dc.authoridAyşe Aralaşmak / 0000-0001-8654-855Xen_US
dc.authorscopusidAyşe Aralaşmak / 6507596742
dc.authorwosidAyşe Aralaşmak / Y-5820-2018
dc.contributor.authorSadeghi, Majid Mohammad
dc.contributor.authorKeçeci, Emin Faruk
dc.contributor.authorKapıcıoğlu, Mehmet
dc.contributor.authorAralaşmak, Ayşe
dc.contributor.authorTezgel, Okan
dc.contributor.authorBaşaran, Murat Alper
dc.contributor.authorYıldız, Fatih
dc.contributor.authorBilsel, Kerem
dc.date.accessioned2022-03-23T05:55:32Z
dc.date.available2022-03-23T05:55:32Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.departmentİstinye Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Dahili Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Incorrect positioning is one of the main factors for glenoid component loosening in reverse shoulder arthroplasty and component placement can be challenging. This study aimed to assess whether Patient-Specific Instrumentation (PSI) provides better guide pin positioning accuracy and is superior to standard guided and freehand instrumentation methods in cases of glenoid bone deformity. Materials and Methods: Based on the Walch classification, five different scapula types were acquired by computed tomography (CT). For each type, two different surgeons placed a guide pin into the scapula using three different methods: freehand method, conventional non-patient-specific guide, and PSI guide. Each method was repeated five times by both surgeons. In these experiments, a total of 150 samples of scapula models were used (5 × 2 × 3 × 5 = 150). Post-operative CT scans of the samples with the guide pin were digitally assessed and the accuracy of the pin placement was determined by comparison to the preoperative planning on a three-dimensional (3D) model. Results: The PSI method showed accuracies to the preoperative plan of 2.68 (SD 2.10) degrees for version angle (p <.05), 2.59 (SD 2.68) degrees for inclination angle (p <.05), and 1.55 (SD 1.26) mm for entry point offset (p <.05). The mean and standard deviation errors compared to planned values of version angle, inclination angle, and entry point offset were statistically significant for the PSI method for the type C defected glenoid and non-arthritic glenoid. Conclusion: Using the PSI guide created by an image processing software tool for guide pin positioning showed advantages in glenoid component positioning over other methods, for defected and intact glenoid types, but correlation with clinical outcomes should be examined. © The Author(s) 2022.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMohammad Sadeghi, M., Kececi, E. F., Kapicioglu, M., Aralasmak, A., Tezgel, O., Basaran, M. A., . . . Bilsel, K. (2022). Three dimensional patient-specific guides for guide pin positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: An experimental study on different glenoid types. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery, 30(1) doi:10.1177/10225536221079432en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/10225536221079432en_US
dc.identifier.issn1022-5536en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85125426933en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1177/10225536221079432
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12713/2578
dc.identifier.volume30en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000765352200001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.institutionauthorAralaşmak, Ayşe
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSAGE Publications Ltden_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Orthopaedic Surgeryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectQuide Pin Positioningen_US
dc.subjectImage Processingen_US
dc.subjectPatient-Specific Quidesen_US
dc.subjectPreoperative Planningen_US
dc.subjectReverse Shoulder Arthroplastyen_US
dc.titleThree dimensional patient-specific guides for guide pin positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: An experimental study on different glenoid typesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
2.pdf
Boyut:
1.48 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: