Effect of different composite resin materials used as core buildups on the trueness of intraoral scanning

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridÖnjen Tak / 0000-0002-3578-9078
dc.authorscopusidÖnjen Tak / 23101443200
dc.authorwosidÖnjen Tak / HDZ-8870-2022
dc.contributor.authorElter, Bahar
dc.contributor.authorDiker, Burcu
dc.contributor.authorTak, Önjen
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-28T11:18:40Z
dc.date.available2021-12-28T11:18:40Z
dc.date.issued2021en_US
dc.departmentİstinye Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the trueness of digital impressions of different composite resin materials that can be used for core buildups in clinical practice. Materials and Methods: A maxillary central incisor was prepared and scanned with an intraoral scanner (Primescan, Dentsply Sirona). Ten composite resin specimens (in three groups: universal composite; flowable composite; and bulk fill composite) were milled in the same dimensions of the prepared tooth and scanned. The data of the prepared tooth were used as reference, and the data obtained from the composite resin specimens were aligned using an evaluation software (Geomagic Studio 12) to determine deviation values. Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn post hoc test was performed to compare differences among the composite resin groups (alpha = .05). Results: There were significant differences in the trueness of digital impressions between some composite resin groups (P < .05). The mean trueness deviation values were in the range of 12.75 mu m (G-aenial Posterior) to 17.06 mu m (Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior). The trueness of G-aenial Posterior (12.75 mu m) was higher than that of Core-X Flow (14.62 mu m), Clearfil Majesty Flow (16.93 mu m), and Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior (17.06 mu m). Filtek Bulk Fill Posterior exhibited lower trueness than Clearfil Majesty Esthetic (12.93 mu m), Clearfil Majesty Posterior (13.50 mu m), and Charisma Classic (13.81 mu m). Conclusion: Different composite resins used for core buildup can impact the trueness of digital impressions, with universal composite resin scans being the truest compared to flowable and bulk fill composite resin scans. All scanned substrate groups can be regarded as within a clinically acceptable range.en_US
dc.identifier.citationElter, B., Diker, B., & Tak, Ö. (2021). Effect of different composite materials used as core build-ups on the trueness of intraoral scanning. The International Journal of Prosthodontics.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.11607/ijp.7275en_US
dc.identifier.endpage607en_US
dc.identifier.issn0893-2174en_US
dc.identifier.issn1942-4426en_US
dc.identifier.issue5en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85118283068en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage600en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.7275
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12713/2365
dc.identifier.volume34en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000731327800008en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.institutionauthorTak, Önjen
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherQUINTESSENCE PUBLISHING CO INCen_US
dc.relation.ispartofINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICSen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleEffect of different composite resin materials used as core buildups on the trueness of intraoral scanningen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu