Automated Classification of Snow-Covered Solar Panel Surfaces Based on Deep Learning Approaches

dc.authoridGuneser, Muhammet Tahir/0000-0003-3502-2034
dc.authoridHameed, Alaa Ali/0000-0002-8514-9255
dc.authorwosidGuneser, Muhammet Tahir/AAS-5014-2021
dc.authorwosidHameed, Alaa Ali/ABI-8417-2020
dc.contributor.authorAl-Dulaimi, Abdullah Ahmed
dc.contributor.authorGuneser, Muhammet Tahir
dc.contributor.authorHameed, Alaa Ali
dc.contributor.authorSalman, Mohammad Shukri
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-19T14:40:44Z
dc.date.available2024-05-19T14:40:44Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİstinye Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractRecently, the demand for renewable energy has increased due to its environmental and economic needs. Solar panels are the mainstay for dealing with solar energy and converting it into another form of usable energy. Solar panels work under suitable climatic conditions that allow the light photons to access the solar cells, as any blocking of sunlight on these cells causes a halt in the panels work and restricts the carry of these photons. Thus, the panels are unable to work under these conditions. A layer of snow forms on the solar panels due to snowfall in areas with low temperatures. Therefore, it causes an insulating layer on solar panels and the inability to produce electrical energy. The detection of snow-covered solar panels is crucial, as it allows us the opportunity to remove snow using some heating techniques more efficiently and restore the photovoltaics system to proper operation. This paper presents five deep learning models,-16,-19, ESNET-18, ? ESNET-50, and ? ESNET-101, which are used for the recognition and classification of solar panel images. In this paper, two different cases were applied; the first case is performed on the original dataset without trying any kind of preprocessing, and the second case is extreme climate conditions and simulated by generating motion noise. Furthermore, the dataset was replicated using the upsampling technique in order to handle the unbalancing issue. The conducted dataset is divided into three different categories, namely; all_snow, no_snow, and partial snow. The five models are trained, validated, and tested on this dataset under the same conditions 60% training, 20% validation, and testing 20% for both cases. The accuracy of the models has been compared and verified to distinguish and classify the processed dataset. The accuracy results in the first case show that the compared models-16,-19, ESNET-18, andESNET-50 give 0.9592, while R ESNET-101 gives 0.9694. In the second case, the models outperformed their counterparts in the first case by evaluating performance, where the accuracy results reached 1.00, 0.9545, 0.9888, 1.00. and 1.00 for-16,-19, R ESNET-18 and R ESNET-50, respectively. Consequently, we conclude that the second case models outperformed their peers.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.32604/cmes.2023.026065
dc.identifier.endpage2319en_US
dc.identifier.issn1526-1492
dc.identifier.issn1526-1506
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85151135955en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3en_US
dc.identifier.startpage2291en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org10.32604/cmes.2023.026065
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12713/5008
dc.identifier.volume136en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000923364200001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherTech Science Pressen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCmes-Computer Modeling In Engineering & Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmz20240519_kaen_US
dc.subjectDeep Learningen_US
dc.subjectCnn Modelsen_US
dc.subjectImage Classificationen_US
dc.subjectSolar Panelsen_US
dc.subjectSolar Panel Defect Detectionen_US
dc.titleAutomated Classification of Snow-Covered Solar Panel Surfaces Based on Deep Learning Approachesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar