A Comparison of Slow Infusion Intermittent Feeding versus Gravity Feeding in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridBozkurt, Ozlem/0000-0002-1282-9030
dc.authoridSahin, Suzan/0000-0002-2599-3075
dc.authoridYavanoğlu Atay, Funda/0000-0002-7921-9376
dc.authorwosidBozkurt, Ozlem/HKN-7780-2023
dc.authorwosidSahin, Suzan/AGE-6338-2022
dc.authorwosidYavanoğlu Atay, Funda/GQP-0143-2022
dc.contributor.authorYavanoglu Atay, Funda
dc.contributor.authorBozkurt, Ozlem
dc.contributor.authorSahin, Suzan
dc.contributor.authorBidev, Duygu
dc.contributor.authorSari, Fatma Nur
dc.contributor.authorUras, Nurdan
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-19T14:41:29Z
dc.date.available2024-05-19T14:41:29Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİstinye Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: The transition to full enteral feeding is important for ensuring adequate growth in preterm infants. Aims: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of two different intermittent feeding methods on the transition to full enteral feeding in preterm infants. Study design: A prospective, randomized controlled study was conducted in a neonatology and perinatology center. Subjects: Preterm infants with a gestational age between 24 + 0/7 and 31 + 6/7 were included in this study. They were divided into two groups: the SIF (slow infusion feeding) group and the IBF (intermittent bolus feeding) group. In the SIF group, feed volumes were administered over one hour using an infusion pump through an orogastric tube, with feeding occurring every three hours. The IBF group received enteral feeding using a gravity-based technique with a syringe through an orogastric tube, completed within 10 to 30 min. Outcome measures: The primary outcome was the achievement of full enteral feeding and the occurrence of feeding intolerance. Results: A total of 103 infants were enrolled in the study (50 in SIF and 53 in IBF). The time to achieve full enteral feeding did not differ significantly between the two groups (p = 0.20). The SIF group had significantly fewer occurrences in which gastric residual volume exceeded 50% (p = 0.01). Moreover, the SIF group had a significantly shorter duration of non-per-oral (NPO) status than the IBF group (p = 0.03). Conclusions: It is our contention that the use of the SIF method as an alternative feeding method is appropriate for infants with feeding intolerance and those at high risk of feeding intolerance.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/children10081389
dc.identifier.issn2227-9067
dc.identifier.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.pmid37628387en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85169005558en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org10.3390/children10081389
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12713/5117
dc.identifier.volume10en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001056691000001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMdpien_US
dc.relation.ispartofChildren-Baselen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmz20240519_kaen_US
dc.subjectFeeding Intoleranceen_US
dc.subjectFeeding Methodsen_US
dc.subjectFull Enteral Feedingen_US
dc.subjectPretermen_US
dc.titleA Comparison of Slow Infusion Intermittent Feeding versus Gravity Feeding in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trialen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu