To genotype or phenotype for drug and food safety? Exiting the technology echo chambers
Yükleniyor...
Dosyalar
Tarih
2018
Dergi Başlığı
Dergi ISSN
Cilt Başlığı
Yayıncı
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc
Erişim Hakkı
info:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
Özet
Scholars throughout history have argued there is nothing more important than understanding and explaining the world that we live in. Both scientists and social scientists share this motivation. Yet, they employ different tools and viewpoints. Scientists and technology experts tend to focus on ‘‘doing science’’ and related questions, such as ‘‘which knowledge is being produced?’’ Social and political science scholars ask questions relating to ‘‘how we do science.’’ Such differences in the types of knowledges that are produced and sought after also create values that differ between scientists and social scientists. Scientists might value, for example, which technology and biomarker are available for cancer precision medicine, whereas social scientists would like to know the epistemology of scientific knowledge: how do we know what we know? Who is funding and producing biomarker knowledge, and to what ends?
Açıklama
Anahtar Kelimeler
Precision Medicine, Drug Safety, Diagnostics, Multi-Omics Research, Science Governance, Innovation Echo Chamber, Political Science, Health Geography
Kaynak
Omics-A Journal of Integrative Biology
WoS Q Değeri
Q2
Scopus Q Değeri
Q2
Cilt
22
Sayı
8
Künye
Ozdemir, V., Endrenyi, L., Hekim, N., Kunej, T., Steuten, L. M., Springer, S., … Bayram, M. (2018). To Genotype or Phenotype for Drug and Food Safety? Exiting the Technology Echo Chambers. OMICS-A JOURNAL OF INTEGRATIVE BIOLOGY, 22(8), 525–527. https://doi.org/10.1089/omi.2018.0111
