First 30 robotic versus last 30 laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridMehmet Mahir Özmen / 0000-0003-0649-0111en_US
dc.authoridCem Emir Güldoğan / 0000-0003-0634-5619en_US
dc.authoridEmre Gündoğdu / 0000-0002-2756-1372
dc.authorscopusidEmre Gündoğdu / 36165504700
dc.authorscopusidCem Emir Güldoğan / 55890565600
dc.authorscopusidMehmet Mahir Özmen / 57211511111
dc.authorwosidMehmet Mahir Özmen / AAO-2321-2020
dc.authorwosidCem Emir Güldoğan / K-3824-2016
dc.authorwosidMehmet Mahir Özmen / AAO-2321-2020
dc.contributor.authorÖzmen, Mehmet Mahir
dc.contributor.authorGündoğdu, Emre
dc.contributor.authorGüldoğan, Cem Emir
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-30T20:06:39Z
dc.date.available2020-08-30T20:06:39Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.departmentİstinye Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractBackground: Robotic sleeve gastrectomy (RSG) is a new and popular option for obesity surgery. This study aims to analyze our experience during the transition period from laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) to RSG. Patients and Methods: Sixty patients with sleeve gastrectomy (SG) were enrolled into the study. Last 30 patients in the LSG group and first 30 patients in the RSG group were included in the study. Total operative time (OT), docking time, complications (intraoperative and postoperative), hospital stay, and amount of postoperative drainage were recorded and groups were compared. Results: There were no complications during surgery. There was no mortality or conversions to another approach in any patient. There were no leaks. Hospital stay, complication rates, and excess weight loss rates were similar in both groups. OT was longer in the RSG group. Postoperative drainage was lesser in the RSG group. Conclusion: RSG is safe and feasible and might be considered as an initial procedure for surgeons who plan to move forward to more complex procedures in bariatric surgery. For an experienced surgeon, the learning curve seems shorter for this procedure.en_US
dc.identifier.citationOzmen, M. M., Gundogdu, E., & Guldogan, C. E. (2019). First 30 Robotic Versus Last 30 Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy. BARIATRIC SURGICAL PRACTICE AND PATIENT CARE, 14(3), 102–106. https://doi.org/10.1089/bari.2018.0055en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1089/bari.2018.0055en_US
dc.identifier.endpage106en_US
dc.identifier.issn2168-023Xen_US
dc.identifier.issn2168-0248en_US
dc.identifier.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85072675359en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage102en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1089/bari.2018.0055
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12713/583
dc.identifier.volume14en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000480127400001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.institutionauthorÖzmen, Mehmet Mahiren_US
dc.institutionauthorGündoğdu, Emreen_US
dc.institutionauthorGüldoğan, Cem Emir
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherMary Ann Liebert, Incen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBariatric Surgical Practice and Patient Careen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectMorbid Obesityen_US
dc.subjectBariatric Surgeryen_US
dc.subjectWeight Lossen_US
dc.subjectLaparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomyen_US
dc.subjectRobotic Sleeve Gastrectomyen_US
dc.titleFirst 30 robotic versus last 30 laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
146.pdf
Boyut:
241.04 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümü Makale Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu