Influence of age, training, intraoral scanner, and software version on the scan accuracy of inexperienced operators

dc.authoridDonmez, Mustafa Borga/0000-0002-3094-7487
dc.authoridZarauz, Cristina/0000-0002-2970-1658
dc.authoridChebib, Najla/0000-0002-4094-6955
dc.authoridKarasan, Duygu/0000-0003-4631-2053
dc.authorwosidDonmez, Mustafa Borga/AGY-6155-2022
dc.contributor.authorZarauz, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorPradies, Guillermo Jesus
dc.contributor.authorChebib, Najla
dc.contributor.authorDonmez, Mustafa Borga
dc.contributor.authorKarasan, Duygu
dc.contributor.authorSailer, Irena
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-19T14:40:51Z
dc.date.available2024-05-19T14:40:51Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİstinye Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurpose: To evaluate the effect of operator age on the scan accuracy (trueness and precision) of inexperienced operators when compared with experienced operators, and how training, intraoral scanner (IOS), and software version affect scan accuracy.Material and Methods: Thirty-four operators were sorted into groups: G1 (operators <25 years old, no experience), G2 (operators >40 years old, no experience), and G3 (experienced IOS operators). They conducted partial-arch scans before and after a 4-session training with two IOSs (Trios 3 and True Definition) and two software versions. These scans were compared with the reference scans obtained from conventional impressions and a laboratory scanner (IScan D103i) to evaluate trueness (mean root mean square values) and precision (standard deviation of root mean square values) with a software program (Geomagic Control X). Kruskal-Wallis and post-hoc Dunn's tests were used to evaluate the effect of age on the scan accuracy of inexperienced groups when compared with experienced operators, while the effect of training, IOS, and software version on scan accuracy was evaluated with Wilcoxon or Mann-Whitney U tests (alpha = 0.05).Results: Before training, G1 and G2 scans had similar accuracy (p >= 0.065). After training, G1 scans had higher accuracy when IOS data was pooled and had higher precision with TD (p <= 0.004). Training increased the scan accuracy (p < 0.001), while newer software increased the trueness of inexperienced operator scans (p = 0.015).Conclusions: Age affected the scan accuracy of inexperienced operators after training, indicating that extended training may be required for older operators. Training increased the scan accuracy, and newer software increased the trueness of inexperienced operator scans.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jopr.13785
dc.identifier.endpage141en_US
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X
dc.identifier.issn1532-849X
dc.identifier.pmid37837217en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85175961752en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage135en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org10.1111/jopr.13785
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12713/5026
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001098468000001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmz20240519_kaen_US
dc.subjectDigital Impressionen_US
dc.subjectIntraoral Scanneren_US
dc.subjectPrecisionen_US
dc.subjectTrainingen_US
dc.subjectTruenessen_US
dc.titleInfluence of age, training, intraoral scanner, and software version on the scan accuracy of inexperienced operatorsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar