Comparison of reliability of 3 resonance frequency analysis devices: An in vitro study

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridÖnjen Tak / 0000-0002-3578-9078en_US
dc.authorscopusidÖnjen Tak / 23101443200
dc.authorwosidÖnjen Tak / AAQ-8052-2020en_US
dc.contributor.authorDiker, Burcu
dc.contributor.authorDiker, Nurettin
dc.contributor.authorTak, Önjen
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-31T10:24:46Z
dc.date.available2022-05-31T10:24:46Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.departmentİstinye Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of the present study was to investigate the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of 3 resonance frequency analysis (RFA) devices and to compare the implant stability quotient (ISQ) values according to implant macro design and diameter in 2 different bone densities. A total of 64 implants (Neoss ProActive; Neoss; Harrogate, UK) of varying diameters (3.5 and 4.0 mm) and implant macro design (tapered and straight) were placed in 2 artificial bone blocks (the density of type 2 and 3). The implant primary stability was measured using Osstell IDx (Osstell; Göteborg, Sweden), Osstell Beacon and Penguin RFA (Integration Diagnostics; Göteborg, Sweden). The ISQ value of each implant was measured by 2 observers and recorded 5 times in 2 directions. The intraobserver and interobserver reliability of RFA devices were evaluated. In addition to that, mean ISQ values were calculated for each RFA device to evaluate the effect of implant diameter, implant macro design, and bone density on ISQ values. ISQ values were significantly higher for implants placed within the type 2 bone than for the type 3 bone. The 4.0-mm diameter implants presented higher ISQ values than 3.5-mm diameter implants. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values for intraobserver reliability were above 0.85 for each observer and the ICC values for interobserver reliability were 0.94, 0.93, and 0.98 for Osstell IDx, Osstell Beacon, and Penguin RFA, respectively. Although there was excellent interobserver reliability with 3 RFA devices, the intraobserver reliability of Osstell Beacon and Penguin RFA were slightly better than Osstell IDx. Bone density and implant diameter were parameters affecting the primary stability of implants.en_US
dc.identifier.citationDiker B, Diker N, Tak Ö. Comparison of Reliability of 3 Resonance Frequency Analysis Devices: An In Vitro Study. J Oral Implantol. 2022 Feb 1;48(1):9-14. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-20-00139. PMID: 33760051.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1563/aaid-joi-D-20-00139en_US
dc.identifier.endpage14en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid33760051en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85128247426en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage9en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.1563/aaid-joi-D-20-00139
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12713/2764
dc.identifier.volume48en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000786304200001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorTak, Önjen
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSilver Chair İnformation Systemsen_US
dc.relation.ispartofThe Journal of Oral Implantologyen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDental Implantsen_US
dc.subjectPrimary Stabilityen_US
dc.subjectResonance Frequency Analysisen_US
dc.titleComparison of reliability of 3 resonance frequency analysis devices: An in vitro studyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu