Influence of implant scan body design (height, diameter, geometry, material, and retention system) on intraoral scanning accuracy: A systematic review

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridDonmez, Mustafa Borga/0000-0002-3094-7487
dc.authoridRevilla-León, Marta/0000-0003-2854-1135
dc.authoridGomez-Polo, Miguel/0000-0001-8614-8484
dc.authoridCakmak, Gulce/0000-0003-1751-9207
dc.authorwosidDonmez, Mustafa Borga/AGY-6155-2022
dc.authorwosidRevilla-León, Marta/AAH-2117-2019
dc.contributor.authorGomez-Polo, Miguel
dc.contributor.authorDonmez, Mustafa Borga
dc.contributor.authorCakmak, Guelce
dc.contributor.authorYilmaz, Burak
dc.contributor.authorRevilla-Leon, Marta
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-19T14:38:47Z
dc.date.available2024-05-19T14:38:47Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.departmentİstinye Üniversitesien_US
dc.description.abstractPurposeTo evaluate the influence of implant scan body (ISB) design (height, diameter, geometry, material, and retention system) on the accuracy of digital implant scans.Material and MethodsA literature search was completed in five databases: PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Embase, World of Science, and Cochrane. A manual search was also conducted. Studies reporting the evaluation of ISB design on the accuracy of digital scans obtained by using IOSs were included. Two investigators evaluated the studies independently by applying the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal. A third examiner was consulted to resolve any lack of consensus. Articles were classified based on the ISB features of height, geometry, material, and retention system.ResultsTwenty articles were included. Among the reviewed studies, 11 investigations analyzed the influence of different ISB geometries, 1 study assessed the impact of ISB diameter, 4 studies investigated the effect of ISB splinting, 2 articles evaluated ISB height, and 2 studies focused on the effect of ISB material on scan accuracy. In addition, 8 studies involved ISBs fabricated with different materials (1- and 2-piece polyetheretherketone and 1-piece titanium ISBs), and all of the reviewed articles tested screw-retained ISBs, except for 3 in vitro studies.ConclusionsThe findings did not enable concrete conclusions regarding the optimal ISB design, whether there is a relationship between IOS technology and a specific ISB design, or the clinical condition that maximizes intraoral scanning accuracy. Research efforts are needed to identify the optimal ISB design and its possible relationship with the IOS selected for acquiring intraoral digital implant scans.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jopr.13774
dc.identifier.endpage180en_US
dc.identifier.issn1059-941X
dc.identifier.issn1532-849X
dc.identifier.pmid37771200en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85174283488en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1en_US
dc.identifier.startpage165en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org10.1111/jopr.13774
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12713/4608
dc.identifier.volume32en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001088115600001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWileyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Prosthodontics-Implant Esthetic and Reconstructive Dentistryen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmz20240519_kaen_US
dc.subjectAccuracyen_US
dc.subjectDigital Impressionen_US
dc.subjectImplant Scan Bodyen_US
dc.subjectProsthodonticsen_US
dc.titleInfluence of implant scan body design (height, diameter, geometry, material, and retention system) on intraoral scanning accuracy: A systematic reviewen_US
dc.typeReview Articleen_US

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu