Alisklamp versus Conventional Dorsal Slit Circumcision: A Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorscopusidMustafa Azizoğlu / 58901683600
dc.contributor.authorAzizoğlu, Mustafa
dc.contributor.authorRisteski, Toni
dc.contributor.authorKlyuev, Sergey
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-18T08:38:00Z
dc.date.available2025-04-18T08:38:00Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.departmentİstinye Üniversitesi, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, Sağlık Bilimleri, Kök Hücre ve Doku Mühendisliği Programı
dc.description.abstractBackground: There are numerous methods of circumcision performed worldwide, typically classified into two main groups: conventional surgical techniques and various device-assisted techniques. Each method has its own advantages, limitations, and potential complications. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of the Alisklamp technique versus the dorsal slit technique in male circumcision procedures. Method: This multicenter RCT compared the dorsal slit and Alisklamp techniques for circumcision, assessing patient demographics and intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. All patients, under local anesthesia via dorsal penile nerve block, were discharged on the same day and followed up at 24–48 h, 1 week, and 1 month. Results: A total of 180 patients enrolled, and 166 patients were included. The study compared postoperative outcomes between the Alisklamp (AK) and dorsal slit (DS) circumcision techniques in 166 patients. Key findings included significantly higher penile edema in the DS group (19%) compared to the AK group (2.4%) (p < 0.001), with severe edema occurring only in the DS group. Wound gaping was more common in the AK group (8.3%) compared to the DS group (1.2%) (p = 0.030). Skin tunnels were observed only in the DS group (9.5%) (p = 0.004). There were no significant differences in nausea, vomiting, bleeding, necrosis, infection, wound dehiscence, chordee, rotational anomalies, or secondary phimosis between the groups. Mean operation time was lower in the AK group than the DS group (7.8 min vs. 15.5 min; p < 0.001). Conclusions: The Alisklamp technique is recommended as the preferred method for circumcision because it minimizes complications, shortens the procedure time, and is easy to apply. © 2024 by the authors.
dc.identifier.citationAzizoglu, M., Risteski, T., & Klyuev, S. (2024). Alisklamp versus Conventional Dorsal Slit Circumcision: A Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(15), 4568.
dc.identifier.doi10.3390/jcm13154568
dc.identifier.issn20770383
dc.identifier.issue15
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85200736080
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm13154568
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12713/6586
dc.identifier.volume13
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001287903200001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ1
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.institutionauthorAzizoğlu, Mustafa
dc.institutionauthoridMustafa Azizoğlu / 0009-0000-3563-1230
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMultidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Clinical Medicine
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectAlisklamp
dc.subjectChildren
dc.subjectDorsal Slit Technique
dc.subjectMale Circumcision
dc.subjectSutureless
dc.titleAlisklamp versus Conventional Dorsal Slit Circumcision: A Multicentric Randomized Controlled Trial
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
jcm-13-04568.pdf
Boyut:
5.11 MB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.17 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

Kök Hücre ve Doku Mühendisliği Programı Makale Koleksiyonu