The learning curve for pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy by using cumulative sum analysis

dc.authoridMehmet Necmettin Mercimek / 0000-0002-0680-4451en_US
dc.authorscopusidMehmet Necmettin Mercimek / 36128860100en_US
dc.authorwosidMehmet Necmettin Mercimek / B-1996-2018en_US
dc.contributor.authorMercimek, Mehmet Necmettin
dc.contributor.authorÖzden, Ender
dc.contributor.authorGülşen, Murat
dc.contributor.authorKalaycı, Onur
dc.contributor.authorYakupoğlu, Yarkın Kamil
dc.contributor.authorBostancı, Yakup
dc.contributor.authorSarıkaya, Şaban
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-31T10:42:36Z
dc.date.available2023-08-31T10:42:36Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.departmentİstinye Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: This study aimed to identify a precise learning curve for pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy (RDN). Methods: Data from 172 consecutive kidney donors who underwent pure RDN between January 2010 and July 2019 were prospectively collected and evaluated. CUSUM (cumulative sum) analysis was used for testing the operation time. Changepoints were determined by using the r program and Binseg method. The cohort was divided into three groups — group 1: competence, including the first 10 cases; group 2: 11–48 cases as proficiency; and group 3: the subsequent 124 cases as expert level. Continuous variables were evaluated using one-way ANOVA, and categorical data were evaluated using the Chi-squared test. Results: Right RDN was performed in 39 (22.7%) donors. The eighth patient was converted to open surgery due to vena cava injury and excluded from the CUSUM analysis. Depending on experience in pure RDN, a significant decrease was detected in operative time (p<0.001), warm ischemia time (p=0.006), and blood loss (p<0.001). Recipient complications and graft function were found to be statistically comparable. Conclusions: In our study, the attainment of expertise in pure RDN was observed after performing 50 cases. The transperitoneal technique, which is a feasible alternative, is far more widely used than pure RDN. We believe that understanding the learning curve associated with pure RDN could facilitate the adoption of this approach as a viable alternative to the transperitoneal approach.en_US
dc.identifier.citationMercimek, M. N., Ozden, E., Gulsen, M., Kalayci, O., Yakupoglu, Y. K. Y., Bostancı, Y., & Sarikaya, S. (2023). The learning curve for pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy by using cumulative sum analysis. Canadian Urological Association Journal, 17(11).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5489/cuaj.8372en_US
dc.identifier.pmid37549348en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85170027563en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5489/cuaj.8372
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12713/3957
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001099821000004en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityN/Aen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorMercimek, Mehmet Necmettin
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherCanadian Urological Associationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofCUAJ-Canadian Urological Association Journalen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectDonor Nephrectomyen_US
dc.subjectLiving Donorsen_US
dc.subjectRetroperitoneoscopyen_US
dc.subjectLearning Curveen_US
dc.subjectCUSUM Analysisen_US
dc.titleThe learning curve for pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy by using cumulative sum analysisen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Yükleniyor...
Küçük Resim
İsim:
document.pdf
Boyut:
241.67 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama: