Negotiating the second mesiobuccal canal: a comparison of nickel titanium files through the experience of undergraduate dental students

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridAyfer Ateş Atav / 0000-0003-0270-8646en_US
dc.authorscopusidAyfer Ateş Atav / 57204595215en_US
dc.authorwosidAyfer Ateş Atav / GXY-7071-2022en_US
dc.contributor.authorAtav Ateş, Ayfer
dc.contributor.authorArıcan, Burçin
dc.contributor.authorÇiftçioglu, Elif
dc.contributor.authorKüçükay, Enver Sedat
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-22T07:35:55Z
dc.date.available2024-02-22T07:35:55Z
dc.date.issued2023en_US
dc.departmentİstinye Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the ability of undergraduate students to reach working length (WL) in second mesiobuccal root canals (MB2) of maxillary first molars (n = 210) by using Reciproc Blue without glide path preparation, and One Curve with glide path preparation. MethodsThe students (n = 105) attended theoretical and practical courses. The first group (n = 53) shaped MB2 root canals using the One Curve system and then Reciproc Blue; the second group (n = 52) shaped MB2 root canals following the reverse sequence. Participants completed a questionnaire. The chi-square and Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical analysis using significance of p The full WL was reached and shaping procedures were completed without complications in Reciproc Blue and One Curve groups at rates of 86.67% and 82.85%, respectively (p > 0.05). Treatment time was shorter in Reciproc Blue (p < 0.05). More (62.9%) students felt the One Curve system safer, while 61% felt the Reciproc Blue system faster. ConclusionsWithin the limitations of this study, instrument kinematics and glide path preparation did not interfere with undergraduate students' ability to achieve the WL in MB2 root canals.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAtav Ateş, A., Arıcan, B., Çiftçioğlu, E., & Küçükay, E. S. (2023). Negotiating the second mesiobuccal canal: A comparison of nickel titanium files through the experience of undergraduate dental students. Journal of Dental Education.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/jdd.13165en_US
dc.identifier.issn0022-0337en_US
dc.identifier.issn1930-7837en_US
dc.identifier.pmid36625222en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85146180667en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jdd.13165
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12713/3854
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000910937400001en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorAtav Ateş, Ayfer
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherWILEYen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATIONen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectDentalen_US
dc.subjectEducationen_US
dc.subjectEndodonticsen_US
dc.subjectGlide Pathen_US
dc.subjectOne Curveen_US
dc.subjectReciproc Blueen_US
dc.subjectStudentsen_US
dc.titleNegotiating the second mesiobuccal canal: a comparison of nickel titanium files through the experience of undergraduate dental studentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
Atav-ates-2023-Negotiating-the-second-mesiobuccal- (1).pdf
Boyut:
665.75 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Klinik Bilimler Bölümü Makale Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu