The intra- and interobserver reliability of five commonly used intertrochanteric femur fracture classification systems

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridOsman Görkem Muratoğlu / 0000-0003-0049-7937en_US
dc.authoridKaya Turan / 0000-0002-0547-995Xen_US
dc.authorscopusidKaya Turan / 57201721233
dc.authorscopusidOsman Görkem Muratoğlu / 57214073565
dc.authorwosidOsman Görkem Muratoğlu / AGS-2887-2022
dc.authorwosidKaya Turan / GSD-1790-2022
dc.contributor.authorYıldırım, Cem
dc.contributor.authorTuran, Kaya
dc.contributor.authorErgün, Turğul
dc.contributor.authorMısır, Abdulhamit
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Mahmud
dc.contributor.authorMuratoğlu, Osman Görkem
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-11T11:35:00Z
dc.date.available2022-04-11T11:35:00Z
dc.date.issued2022en_US
dc.departmentİstinye Üniversitesi, Tıp Fakültesi, Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Bölümüen_US
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study aims to evaluate the effect of surgical experience on reliability for Boyd-Griffin, Evans/Jensen, Evans, Orthopaedic Trauma Association (main and subgroups), and Tronzo classification systems. Patients and methods: Between January 2013 and December 2014, radiological images of a total of 60 patients (13 males, 47 females; mean age: 78.9±21.9 years; range, 61 to 96 years) with the diagnosis of intertrochanteric femur fracture were analyzed. Radiographs were evaluated and classified by five residents and five orthopedics and traumatology surgeons according to the Evans, Boyd-Griffin, Evans/Jensen, OTA, and Tronzo classification systems. Intra- and interobserver reliability were calculated using the kappa statistics. Results: The worst intraobserver compatibility among the residents was the classification system with OTA subgroups (?=0.516), while the classification system with the best intraobserver fit was found to be OTA main groups (?=0.744). The worst agreement among surgeons was in the Evans classification system (?=0.456). However, the best intraobserver agreement was in the OTA main groups (?=0.741). The best interobserver agreement was observed regarding the OTA main groups (?=0.699). Conclusion: The classification that has the best harmony both among residents and surgeons, and between residents and surgeons is the OTA main group classification.en_US
dc.identifier.citationYıldırım, C., Muratoğlu, O. G., Turan, K., Ergün, T., Mısır, A., & Aydın, M. (2022). The intra-and interobserver reliability of five commonly used intertrochanteric femur fracture classification systems. Jt Dis Relat Surg, 33(1), 187-192.en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.52312/jdrs.2022.498en_US
dc.identifier.endpage192en_US
dc.identifier.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.pmid35361094en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85127442340en_US
dc.identifier.scopusqualityN/Aen_US
dc.identifier.startpage187en_US
dc.identifier.trdizinid522474en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.52312/jdrs.2022.498
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12713/2629
dc.identifier.volume33en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000778960800022en_US
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3en_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Scienceen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopusen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakTR-Dizinen_US
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMeden_US
dc.institutionauthorTuran, Kaya
dc.institutionauthorMuratoğlu, Osman Görkem
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJt Dis Relat Surgen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.titleThe intra- and interobserver reliability of five commonly used intertrochanteric femur fracture classification systemsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim
İsim:
998.pdf
Boyut:
343.73 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Tam Metin / Full Text
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
Küçük Resim Yok
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

PubMed İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
TR-Dizin İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WoS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu