Comparison of measured deviations in digital implant scans depending on software and operator
dc.authorid | Mustafa Borga Dönmez / 0000-0002-3094-7487 | en_US |
dc.authorscopusid | Mustafa Borga Dönmez / 57202022054 | en_US |
dc.authorwosid | Mustafa Borga Dönmez / AGY-6155-2022 | |
dc.contributor.author | Çakmak, Gülce | |
dc.contributor.author | Marques, Vinicius Rizzo | |
dc.contributor.author | Dönmez, Mustafa Borga | |
dc.contributor.author | Lu, Wei-En | |
dc.contributor.author | Abou-Ayash, Samir | |
dc.contributor.author | Yılmaz, Burak | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-06-13T13:44:08Z | |
dc.date.available | 2022-06-13T13:44:08Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | en_US |
dc.department | İstinye Üniversitesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Klinik Bilimler Bölümü | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: To investigate the effect of 3-dimensional (3D) analysis software and operator on the measured deviations in implant scans. Material and Methods: A combined healing abutment-scan body (CHA-SB) system was digitized with an industrial scanner (ATOS Core 80) to generate a master standard tessellation language file (MRM-STL) and an intraoral scanner (TRIOS 3) to generate 9 test-scan STL files, which were transferred into metrology-grade (Geomagic Control X, GX and GOM Inspect, GM) and nonmetrology-grade (Medit Link, ML) software for deviation analysis. Test-scan STLs were superimposed over MRM-STL and 2 planes passing through the center of the SB were generated. Distance deviations at 8 points on these planes were analyzed by two different operators with similar level of experience. Data were analyzed with analysis of variance and F tests (?=.05). Results: Only model 1 (P=.049) analyzed by operator 2 showed significant differences among tested software, and the highest deviations were measured with GM (P?.037). However, the difference in values measured with GX and ML was nonsignificant (P=.91). Operator correlation was high (ICC?.712, P?.011), except for models 1 (GM, ICC=-.335, P=.813), 2 (GM, ICC=.025, P=.468 and ML, ICC=-.013, P=.507), 6 (GM, ICC=-.085, P=.583), and 8 (GM, ICC=-.386, P=.85). Conclusion: The measured deviations in implant scans in all models, except for one, were similar among the tested software, regardless of the operator. The inter-rater reliability of operators while using tested 3D analysis software was overall high. When observed, low inter-rater reliability was mostly with only one of the metrology grade software. Clinical Significance: Nonmetrology-grade 3D analysis software may be a suitable alternative to metrology-grade software to measure the deviations in digital implant scan body scans. When GOM metrology-software is used, measured deviations in implant scan body scans may vary more across operators. © 2022 | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Cakmak, G., Marques, V. R., Donmez, M. B., Lu, W. -., Abou-Ayash, S., & Yilmaz, B. (2022). Comparison of measured deviations in digital implant scans depending on software and operator. Journal of Dentistry, 122 doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104154 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104154 | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0300-5712 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85131121487 | en_US |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q1 | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104154 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12713/2881 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 122 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000807408300001 | en_US |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q1 | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | en_US |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | PubMed | en_US |
dc.institutionauthor | Dönmez, Mustafa Borga | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_US |
dc.relation.ispartof | Journal of Dentistry | en_US |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
dc.subject | Deviation | en_US |
dc.subject | Implant | en_US |
dc.subject | Scan | en_US |
dc.subject | Scanbody | en_US |
dc.subject | Software | en_US |
dc.title | Comparison of measured deviations in digital implant scans depending on software and operator | en_US |
dc.type | Article | en_US |